From Linux Raid Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Debian mdadm FAQ ==
Debian has a [FAQ
Debian has a [FAQ] on Linux raid. Some comments:] on Linux raid. Some comments:  

Revision as of 14:53, 20 December 2008

Debian mdadm FAQ

Debian has a [FAQ] on Linux raid. Some comments:

Answer 4b: The FAQ says that for a 4-disk raid10 array, you can survive two disk failures in half of the cases. The real figure is that in 2/3 of the cases you can survive.

Answer 6: The raid10 layout actually makes sense with only 2 disks, the FAQ says 3 disks are needed. Also "somewhat improved performance" is not adequeate, raid10,f2 offers something like twice the performance of normal RAID1+0 for sequential reading.

The FAQ references which actually does not refer to current Linux kernel raid10 technology, but to RAID1+0 versus RAID0+1 nested raid layout.

What does the output of mdadm --explain mean


On a raid1 with a 1.0 metadata I see:

  Array Slot : 3 (failed, failed, 0, 1)
  Array State : uU 2 failed


Every device in a 1.x array is assigned a 'slot' number. This number is stable - it never changes.

Each device in the array also has a 'role' number indicating its current role in the array, which is either to be a spare or to have a position (0, 1, ...) in the array.

The output you produces says that this device occupies slot 3. It then notes that:

 the device which occupied slot 0 has failed
 the device which occupied slot 1 has failed
 the device which occupies slot 2 has role 0
 the device which occupies slot 3 has role 1

Then it shows you the state which indicated how the different roles are going.


means that both roles are 'up', and the 'this' device has the second role (capital U for 'this' device). Two devices have previously failed.

We should probably get rid of that '2 failed' bit, it isn't helpful. We should probably report 'empty' rather than 'failed' in the 'Array Slot' line.

Note that if you fail a devices, remove it, then add it back in such that it doesn't appear to be a re-add, it will be treated like a new device and get a new slot number. (after all the old device was faulty, this one isn't so it must be a new device ?). I should probably get it to re-use the slot number in that case.

Personal tools